Eloy Duran
eloy.****@gmail*****
Mon Sep 10 02:08:44 JST 2007
Committed in rev 2038. Eloy On 9/9/07, Satoshi Nakagawa <snaka****@infot*****> wrote: > I agreed. > I think it's good. > > -- > Satoshi Nakagawa > > > On 2007/09/09, at 2:39, Laurent Sansonetti wrote: > > > I vote for this :) > > > > What do others think? > > > > Laurent > > > > On Sep 8, 2007, at 7:03 PM, Eloy Duran wrote: > > > >> Ok, so do we then settle on the following? > >> > >> #<NSCFString "foo"> > >> > >> #<NSCFArray [#<NSCFString "foo">, #<NSCFNumber 99.99>]> > >> > >> #<NSCFNumber 99.99> > >> #<NSCFNumber true> > >> #<NSCFNumber 42> > >> > >> #<NSDictionary {#<NSCFString "foo"> => #<NSCFNumber 42>}> > >> > >> On 9/8/07, Laurent Sansonetti <lsans****@apple*****> wrote: > >>> I think we should keep the full class names. It's important for > >>> consistency, since all other #inspect methods return them. We could > >>> nevertheless drop the OSX prefix in all #inspect methods. > >>> > >>> The IDs are interesting to determine if 2 objects of the same value > >>> are different instances, or the same object. Originally I was > >>> thinking > >>> about keeping them too, but I revised by judgment. ObjC doesn't > >>> reveal > >>> them in the primitive types [-description] methods, so we shouldn't > >>> need too. One can still call #ocid to determine the ObjC address. > >>> > >>> Laurent > >>> > >>> On Sep 8, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Eloy Duran wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hey Satoshi-san, > >>>> > >>>> I think we should at least show the full classname, so > >>>> OSX::NSCFString etc. > >>>> > >>>> The id's are indeed a point of debate, because also with ruby's > >>>> String, Array, Hash, and Numeric the #inspect method doesn't show > >>>> the > >>>> id.... > >>>> > >>>> Eloy > >>>> > >>>> On 9/8/07, Satoshi Nakagawa <snaka****@infot*****> wrote: > >>>>> Hi. > >>>>> > >>>>> I prefer shorter form. > >>>>> > >>>>> <NSString "foo"> > >>>>> <NSNumber 99.99> > >>>>> <NSArray [<NSString "foo">, <NSNumber 99.99>]> > >>>>> <NSDictionary {<NSString "foo"> => <NSNumber 42>}> > >>>>> > >>>>> or > >>>>> > >>>>> <NS "foo"> > >>>>> <NS 99.99> > >>>>> <NS [<NS "foo">, <NS 99.99>]> > >>>>> <NS {<NS "foo"> => <NS 42>}> > >>>>> > >>>>> Because these types are value types, so we don't need to > >>>>> know their ids. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Satoshi Nakagawa > > _______________________________________________ > Rubycocoa-devel mailing list > Rubyc****@lists***** > http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/rubycocoa-devel >
