Eloy Duran
eloy.****@gmail*****
Sun Sep 9 02:03:36 JST 2007
Ok, so do we then settle on the following?
#<NSCFString "foo">
#<NSCFArray [#<NSCFString "foo">, #<NSCFNumber 99.99>]>
#<NSCFNumber 99.99>
#<NSCFNumber true>
#<NSCFNumber 42>
#<NSDictionary {#<NSCFString "foo"> => #<NSCFNumber 42>}>
On 9/8/07, Laurent Sansonetti <lsans****@apple*****> wrote:
> I think we should keep the full class names. It's important for
> consistency, since all other #inspect methods return them. We could
> nevertheless drop the OSX prefix in all #inspect methods.
>
> The IDs are interesting to determine if 2 objects of the same value
> are different instances, or the same object. Originally I was thinking
> about keeping them too, but I revised by judgment. ObjC doesn't reveal
> them in the primitive types [-description] methods, so we shouldn't
> need too. One can still call #ocid to determine the ObjC address.
>
> Laurent
>
> On Sep 8, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Eloy Duran wrote:
>
> > Hey Satoshi-san,
> >
> > I think we should at least show the full classname, so
> > OSX::NSCFString etc.
> >
> > The id's are indeed a point of debate, because also with ruby's
> > String, Array, Hash, and Numeric the #inspect method doesn't show the
> > id....
> >
> > Eloy
> >
> > On 9/8/07, Satoshi Nakagawa <snaka****@infot*****> wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> I prefer shorter form.
> >>
> >> <NSString "foo">
> >> <NSNumber 99.99>
> >> <NSArray [<NSString "foo">, <NSNumber 99.99>]>
> >> <NSDictionary {<NSString "foo"> => <NSNumber 42>}>
> >>
> >> or
> >>
> >> <NS "foo">
> >> <NS 99.99>
> >> <NS [<NS "foo">, <NS 99.99>]>
> >> <NS {<NS "foo"> => <NS 42>}>
> >>
> >> Because these types are value types, so we don't need to
> >> know their ids.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Satoshi Nakagawa
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Rubycocoa-devel mailing list
> >> Rubyc****@lists*****
> >> http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/rubycocoa-devel
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rubycocoa-devel mailing list
> > Rubyc****@lists*****
> > http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/rubycocoa-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rubycocoa-devel mailing list
> Rubyc****@lists*****
> http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/rubycocoa-devel
>