Fujii Masao
masao****@gmail*****
2013年 7月 31日 (水) 21:22:42 JST
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Amit Langote <amitl****@gmail*****> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Beena Emerson <memis****@gmail*****> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have not checked the entire patch. >> >> I just wanted to bring to notice that with the patch applied, both pg_trgm >> and pg_bigm cannot co-exist in the database as they now have same definition >> for many functions like similarity, show_limit, set_limit, etc. >> >> > > Oh, wondering if something like defining a schema say 'pg_bigm' and > qualifying such conflicting names with the schema name would work. > Thoughts? Doesn't this make the usability of pg_bigm worse? For example, a user of pg_bigm always needs to specify the 'pg_bigm' schema name when using pg_bigm. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
Fork